Associations Working Together is The Power of A

Join the association community's open forum as we work to solve the nation's most critical issues. 

Administration Hedges on Co-ops

Aug 17

Although it has been hinted at for weeks, this Sunday the Obama administration made its biggest hedge of support for the “public plan”.  On CNN’s State of the Union Sunday night, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the public plan “is not the essential element” to health care reform for the administration.  She also signaled potential support for the co-ops plan being considered in the Senate Finance Committee.

Sebelius reiterated on the program that the essential components for any health care plan that would be supported by the White House are choice and competition.  Her remarks came one day after the President at a town hall in Montana called the public plan “one sliver” of overall health care reform.

Update: White House and Congressional officials clarified Secretary Sebelius’ comments, saying that the administration still supports the public plan but does not consider it the most important part of reform.

The Senator who initially proposed the co-op proposal, Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND), said on Fox News Sunday that the public plan did not have enough support in the Senate, and his co-op proposal was the only plan that could attract enough votes to pass comprehensive health care reform.  He also reiterated that the co-ops that would be established would be nonprofit and member-run.  On the same program, Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) expressed tentative support for the co-op proposal, lending credence to the idea that co-ops can be a bipartisan proposal.  You can read more details on the co-op proposal here.

The problem with the co-op proposal from a political standpoint comes from some members of the Democratic caucus.  Last month, members of the Progressive Caucus sent a letter to the House leadership stating that the letter’s 60 signatories would not support any comprehensive health care bill without a public option.  Yesterday, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) told CNN that a public plan was an essential element for liberal support for a bill.  “The only way we can be sure that very low-income people and persons who work for companies that don’t offer insurance have access to it, is through an option that would give the private insurance companies a little competition,” she said.

Quick Hits

Politico reports that a revised timeline for House passage of health care has been released.  Merging of the three committee bills is about 80-85% done, and the new target date for passage is the end of September… The Senate is still looking to hold to the September 15 deadline for a Finance Committee deal, and a possible deadline for floor passage would be right before Columbus Day… Is the administration’s promise that a new plan would allow everyone to keep their insurance accurate? asks The Washington Post.

This entry was posted on Monday, August 17th, 2009 at 11:03 am and is filed under Economic Recovery. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

by: Robert

Bookmark and Share

One Response to “Administration Hedges on Co-ops”

  1. Glenn Tecker Says:

    from cnn 5 minutes ago…post ree the white house preparing its own plan and support foir coops in the house and senate:

    The legislation endorsed by three House committees includes language allowing a modest expansion of the co-op experiment, and the idea has broader support in the Senate, where an effort to get a more centrist bill out of the Finance Committee will take on added urgency after Labor Day.

    Asked why there isn’t broader support for co-ops, Oemichen, who once worked as an aide in the House of Representatives, said it is a simple question of familiarity.

    “There just are not a lot of people on the Hill who understand what a cooperative is and what a cooperative can do,” he said.

    Conrad has suggested the government could provide about $6 billion in funding to get more co-ops up and running, and he and his allies in the debate believe this approach will be more successful and have more support politically than a pure government-run health insurance options.

    Some, though, have questioned whether a model that works well in rural areas can be copied in urban or suburban areas, or have raised questions about the formulas that would be necessary to offer subsidies to low-income Americans without health insurance. Others have warned that regulating health co-ops would create new bureaucracy.

    From his perspective on the farm in rural Wisconsin, Topel says it makes sense to him to try something with a proven track record before launching a sweeping new government program.

    “I just can’t see, being a private businessman, how the government can do anything more efficiently,” he said. “As an owner of the company, you’re going to make sure you get the best rates and the lowest rates, and I’m not sure the government can do that. But certainly the co-op is an option, and I think a much better option than a government option would be.

Post Your Comment